Supreme Court Declines to Hear Corner-Crossing Case
The Supreme Court declined to hear the corner-crossing case, which originated from four hunters from Missouri crossing a corner in Wyoming.
The Court announced that it would not hear the case, providing no reasoning for its decision. This means that the issue, which has been a point of contention in the public-land hunting community for years, is partially settled in the West.
According to the hunters' attorney, Ryan Semerad, corner crossing remains legal in Oklahoma, Kansas, New Mexico, Colorado, Wyoming, and Utah, which are states covered by the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals.
However, the legality of corner crossing remains unclear in other areas, leaving a gray area in the law.
No reasoning was provided by the justices for declining to hear the case.
Author's summary: Court declines corner-crossing case.
More News
- Tony Vitello on campus Monday for Tennessee baseball scrimmage
- 2 Canadian Dividend Giants That Belong in Every Portfolio
- Rodrigo Paz Wins: Bolivia's Electoral Context in Five Charts
- Man with semi-automatic rifle arrested after threatening to shoot up Atlanta airport, police say
- Apple Stock Powers the Dow After iPhone Sales, Bull Notes - Schaeffer's Investment Research
- High winds across parts of Colorado create fire danger Monday
- Illinois SNAP errors could cost taxpayers up to $700 million in penalties
- Amazon Deletes Prime Video Tweet Mocking Woman's Engagement Ring With 'The Summer I Turned Pretty' Meme
- REM line to Montreal's North Shore to begin Nov. 17, adding 14 new stations
- Illinois PIRG: State Farm's influence blocks regulators' probe