Rumor that Charlie Kirk subscribed to trans influencer's OnlyFans lacks evidence

Claim and context

A rumor circulated online alleging that conservative activist Charlie Kirk secretly subscribed to a transgender influencer’s OnlyFans account and spent tens of thousands of dollars there. The story presented Kirk as a paying customer of the creator’s adult content, in tension with his public opposition to OnlyFans and anti-trans political stance.

Origin of the allegation

The claim appears to have started with social media posts by a trans creator, often identified as Jade Trap Girl, who said that Kirk had used his legal name and personal credit card to access her paid page. She also asserted that the account connected to him used a politically themed username and that his total spending on her content was around 30,000 U.S. dollars or the equivalent in pounds.

Use of screenshots as “evidence”

Supporters of the rumor circulated images that were described as screenshots from OnlyFans, supposedly showing the relevant username, payment history, and subscriber identity. These screenshots were heavily redacted, with blurred or generic payment information, no verifiable timestamps, and no clear technical link tying the records directly to Kirk himself.

Technical doubts and verification attempts

Skeptical users tested details of the story by trying to register the same username that was widely claimed to belong to Kirk’s alleged OnlyFans account. One such attempt reported that the handle was available for registration, which would not be possible if it were already assigned under OnlyFans’ non-duplicate username rules, raising further doubts about the authenticity of the account attribution.

Lack of corroborating proof

To date, the allegations have not been backed by independent documentation, platform-confirmed data, or other reliable verification that Kirk personally held the account or sent the payments described. The creator’s assertions that she “has the receipts” have not been supported by evidence that can be independently checked, leaving the claim unsubstantiated.

Public reaction and broader issues

Online reactions split between those who embraced the story as a sign of hypocrisy and those who stressed the absence of solid proof. The episode has become an example of how quickly unverified claims about public figures can spread, especially when they intersect with political tensions around trans issues, privacy, and adult platforms.

There is no verifiable evidence that Charlie Kirk subscribed to a trans influencer’s OnlyFans account or sent her $30,000; the rumor rests on unconfirmed and technically questionable screenshots.

Summary

Unverified screenshots and a lack of platform-confirmed data leave the OnlyFans rumor about Charlie Kirk without credible proof, illustrating how viral allegations can outpace evidence in politicized online debates.

Snopes — 2025-11-29